<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Polish Athena</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ggypolska.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>(pol·ish athēnâ ) Slavic Goddess of Stupidity and Peace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviews, What About Them. by gynocrat</title>
		<link>http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/reviews-what-about-them/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>gynocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hey Erastes.  When I saw those comments she made my first instinct was to call her out and say -&lt;i&gt; hey, we&#039;re not that close so...&lt;/i&gt;

But I stopped myself.  You and I have a good rapport online when it comes to historical fiction; no, we don&#039;t always agree on everything in fandom or outside of it - but that doesn&#039;t make us enemies in my book.  ^_^  You have a great historical blog - it made sense to solicit you for a review.  I guess in the commentators mind, if I speak to you online or comment at your LJ - all reviews of my work from you are tainted.  Oy.

You reviewed Gadarene fairly as well, pointed out both the good and the bad - and that came on the heels of the very big accuracy/crit kerfluffle at Torquere between my co-author and a friend of yours.  It didn&#039;t matter to you, you just reviewed the work because your professional enough to do that.  

You knew my views on the whole Lambda thing - we agreed to disagree; but you still took Games in and gave it a review.  Your aces.  I don&#039;t care what any one else thinks.  ^_^v</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Erastes.  When I saw those comments she made my first instinct was to call her out and say -<i> hey, we&#8217;re not that close so&#8230;</i></p>
<p>But I stopped myself.  You and I have a good rapport online when it comes to historical fiction; no, we don&#8217;t always agree on everything in fandom or outside of it &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t make us enemies in my book.  ^_^  You have a great historical blog &#8211; it made sense to solicit you for a review.  I guess in the commentators mind, if I speak to you online or comment at your LJ &#8211; all reviews of my work from you are tainted.  Oy.</p>
<p>You reviewed Gadarene fairly as well, pointed out both the good and the bad &#8211; and that came on the heels of the very big accuracy/crit kerfluffle at Torquere between my co-author and a friend of yours.  It didn&#8217;t matter to you, you just reviewed the work because your professional enough to do that.  </p>
<p>You knew my views on the whole Lambda thing &#8211; we agreed to disagree; but you still took Games in and gave it a review.  Your aces.  I don&#8217;t care what any one else thinks.  ^_^v</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviews, What About Them. by Erastes</title>
		<link>http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/reviews-what-about-them/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Erastes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry that you were accused of having a favourable review because we speak online.  I&#039;m getting some peculiar responses along that line recently - I&#039;m accused of giving bad reviews to people because:

i don&#039;t like the writer
i don&#039;t like the publisher
I&#039;m jealous of the competition

Some people have said that I shouldn&#039;t be reviewing because I&#039;m an author.

Some people have said that reviewers aren&#039;t readers.(!)

Some people say I shouldn&#039;t give unfavourable reviews at all - particularly if I&#039;m trying to promote historical fiction. And I&#039;m quite sure that You Know Who considers that certain writers tend to get a higher score because I&#039;m considered to be their friend.

The logic burns me.

It makes me cast wider for reviewers--I&#039;ll ask Hayden Thorne to review my own books for example, because I trust her implicitly to mark me down if I don&#039;t come up to scratch (she gave Transgressions a 4) and she&#039;s not bothered that it&#039;s my site.  And I now try and avoid reviewing Charlie or Lee or Alex for those reasons.

To that detractor I say - if you&#039;ve read &quot;Games&quot; then you should see what a damned good--and brave--book it was. It&#039;s impossible to judge a graphic novel under the same conditions as a novel, there&#039;s no &quot;deathless prose&quot; for example, but judging on the criteria we use: the history, the writing, the GAY history - and the fact that it had everything a good story needed, characters that flew off the page, it was a no brainer that it was going to get a good mark, and a highly recommended stamp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry that you were accused of having a favourable review because we speak online.  I&#8217;m getting some peculiar responses along that line recently &#8211; I&#8217;m accused of giving bad reviews to people because:</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t like the writer<br />
i don&#8217;t like the publisher<br />
I&#8217;m jealous of the competition</p>
<p>Some people have said that I shouldn&#8217;t be reviewing because I&#8217;m an author.</p>
<p>Some people have said that reviewers aren&#8217;t readers.(!)</p>
<p>Some people say I shouldn&#8217;t give unfavourable reviews at all &#8211; particularly if I&#8217;m trying to promote historical fiction. And I&#8217;m quite sure that You Know Who considers that certain writers tend to get a higher score because I&#8217;m considered to be their friend.</p>
<p>The logic burns me.</p>
<p>It makes me cast wider for reviewers&#8211;I&#8217;ll ask Hayden Thorne to review my own books for example, because I trust her implicitly to mark me down if I don&#8217;t come up to scratch (she gave Transgressions a 4) and she&#8217;s not bothered that it&#8217;s my site.  And I now try and avoid reviewing Charlie or Lee or Alex for those reasons.</p>
<p>To that detractor I say &#8211; if you&#8217;ve read &#8220;Games&#8221; then you should see what a damned good&#8211;and brave&#8211;book it was. It&#8217;s impossible to judge a graphic novel under the same conditions as a novel, there&#8217;s no &#8220;deathless prose&#8221; for example, but judging on the criteria we use: the history, the writing, the GAY history &#8211; and the fact that it had everything a good story needed, characters that flew off the page, it was a no brainer that it was going to get a good mark, and a highly recommended stamp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviews, What About Them. by gynocrat</title>
		<link>http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/reviews-what-about-them/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>gynocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Sorry Nikita, I likely shouldn&#039;t have blogged this - I trust your reviews of my work and other works as well, but when I saw the comment  this person made I wasn&#039;t shocked.  [it was in an email sent to me :/] I have a great relationship with you guys and if they think you&#039;re biased - screw em.  I&#039;ll still keep sending you stuff and relying on your reviews.

^_^v</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Nikita, I likely shouldn&#8217;t have blogged this &#8211; I trust your reviews of my work and other works as well, but when I saw the comment  this person made I wasn&#8217;t shocked.  [it was in an email sent to me :/] I have a great relationship with you guys and if they think you&#8217;re biased &#8211; screw em.  I&#8217;ll still keep sending you stuff and relying on your reviews.</p>
<p>^_^v</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reviews, What About Them. by Nikita</title>
		<link>http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/reviews-what-about-them/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ggypolska.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve given two of your published books honest praise because they merit praise. To say different--that either book doesn&#039;t deserve accolades--is implying that I&#039;m a liar. What I think this publisher is missing, is that BND&#039;s fans come first. I&#039;m not going to tell people to spend his/her hard-earned money on crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve given two of your published books honest praise because they merit praise. To say different&#8211;that either book doesn&#8217;t deserve accolades&#8211;is implying that I&#8217;m a liar. What I think this publisher is missing, is that BND&#8217;s fans come first. I&#8217;m not going to tell people to spend his/her hard-earned money on crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
